Petitioners sought to establish that a decree was executed. The High Court held the writ petition infructuous and disposed of it without costs.
No costs to any party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp 4127.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4127 OF 2014
Sattar Khan Masood Khan and others .. Petitioners Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri. S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : 06th September, 2018
PER COURT:
. Mr. Jahagirdar, the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the decree stands executed.
[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
ass/wp 4127.14
Sattar Khan Masood Khan and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
