The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking the framing of general guidelines for Family Courts and directed the trial court to pass a reasoned order on an interim application after hearing both parties.
Direction to the Family Court to decide Exhibit 21 on merits after hearing; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6wp2701.18.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2701 of 2018
Mrs. Malika Nirmal Parekh ... Petitioner
V/s.
Mr. Nirmal Manoj Parekh & anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Siddharth Chandrashekhar a/w. Ms. Li Shufen & Mrs. Suchitra Ramani i/b. Mr. Suresh Chandrashekhar for the petitioner.
Mr. Nirmal Parekh, respondent no.1 present in person.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
5th March, 2018.
P.C.
Perused the record placed before us. It is informed that interim application Exhibit 21 is listed on 20th March, 2018 for hearing before the Family Court. Petitioner and respondent-in-person submit that
application will be argued on 20th March, 2018.
2/2 6wp2701.18.sxw
Exhibit 21 after hearing both the parties by passing a reasoned order on its own merits.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can lay down guidelines for Family Courts under writ jurisdiction.
Whether the Family Court application (Exhibit 21) required a reasoned order on merits.
Mrs. Malika Nirmal Parekh
Mr. Nirmal Manoj Parekh
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
