The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition to approach the National Green Tribunal. Leave was granted and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pvr 1/1 901wp1856-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 1856 OF 2018
Mussadik Sayyad Kadri ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.R.P.Hake-Patil, i/b. Mr.S.P.Kadam, for the Petitioner.
Mr.P.P. More, AGP for the State-Respondents.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S.KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 1, 2018.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the writ petition as he is advised to approach the National
Green Tribunal.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Mussadik Sayyad Kadri
State Of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
