Disposed

Madhav Dhondiba Waghmare v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC21 Jul 2018WP/2635/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of multiple writ petitions regarding the automatic disqualification of Gram Panchayat members for submitting caste validity certificates after the six-month statutory period. The court kept them in abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision on the Anant Ulahalkar judgment.

What did the court decide?

Protected against disqualification pending Supreme Court decision; time allowed for deposit of deficit court fees.

Madhav Dhondiba Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Election Law | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

wpgroupVALIDITY

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

2 WRIT PETITION NO. 2634 OF 2017

¶5

WITH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.2635 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2636 OF 2017

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.2637/2017

¶9

JIJABAI NIRANJAN BHARTI, MADHAV DHONDIBA WAGHMARE, SHESHIKALA RAMDAS PANCHAL AND SUNDARBAI VITTHAL HAMNATE.

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶12

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Gaikwad Anil M.. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Shri S.R.Yadav. Advocate for Respondent 3 : Shri Deshmukh Umakant B.

¶13

3 WRIT PETITION NO. 4236 OF 2017

¶14

EKNATH SHANKAR GAWALI

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶17

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Sunil B. Jadhav h/f Shri Bodkhe Bhaginath T..

¶18

AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Shri B.A.Shinde. Advocate for Respondent 4 : Shri A.G.Deshmukh.

¶19

6 WRIT PETITION NO. 4177 OF 2015

¶20

KHUSHAL DULA BHIL AND OTHERS

¶21

VERSUS

¶22

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶23

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Patil Paresh B..

¶24

¶25

wpgroupVALIDITY

¶26

AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri S.R.Yadav. Advocate for Respondent 4 : Shri Yenegure Apparao.

¶27

8 WRIT PETITION NO. 3292 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3293 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3294 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3295 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3296 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3297 OF 2017

¶28

PADMA BHAUSAHEB JADHAV, KAMAL BABAN KADAM, CHANDU TULSHIRAM KHAMKAR, AMIL CHIMAJI SHINDE, SUMAN SAHEBRAO MADANE AND RUPALI VILAS HOLKAR. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶29

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Nitin V. Gaware h/f Shri Deshpande Shantanu A..

¶30

AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri S.R.Yadav and Shri B.A.Shinde.

¶31

9 WRIT PETITION NO. 3598 OF 2017 WITH

¶32

WRIT PETITION NO.3599 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3600 OF 2017

¶33

AVINASH BHAGWAT BACHKAR, ASHABAI DATTATRAYA KHULE AND MUKTABAI DATTATRAYA SHELKE. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶34

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Nitin V. Gaware h/f Shri Deshpande

wpgroupVALIDITY

Shantanu A..

AGP for Respondents 1 to 2 : Shri S.R.Yadav and Shri B.A.Shinde. Advocate for Respondent 3 : Shri U.B. Deshmukh.

¶39

10 WRIT PETITION NO. 4381 OF 2017

¶40

WITH WP/4382/2017 WITH WP/4383/2017 WITH WP/4384/2017 WITH WP/4385/2017

¶41

KANIFNATH BHANUDAS BAVANE VERSUS

¶42

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶43

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Tarde Vivek V AGP for Respondents 1 to 4 : Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶44

11 WRIT PETITION NO. 4468 OF 2017

¶45

SAKHARBAI AJINATH WAGHMARE AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶46

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶47

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶48

12 WRIT PETITION NO. 4471 OF 2017

¶49

SUVARNA BHAUSAHEB SHINDE AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶50

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶51

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶52

13 WRIT PETITION NO. 4473 OF 2017

¶53

AJIT POPAT BHAIK AND ANOTHER

¶54

VERSUS

¶55

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶56

¶57

wpgroupVALIDITY

¶58

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶59

14 WRIT PETITION NO. 4474 OF 2017

¶60

ROHINI BALASAHEB LAWANDE VERSUS

¶61

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶62

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶63

15 WRIT PETITION NO. 4708 OF 2017

¶64

YOGESH SURESH HONDE AND OTHERS

¶65

VERSUS

¶66

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶67

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Kotkar Sachin S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶68

16 WRIT PETITION NO. 5161 OF 2017

¶69

ARJUN LAHANU GHORPADE

¶70

VERSUS

¶71

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶72

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Tarde Vivek V.

¶73

AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶74

17 WRIT PETITION NO. 5162 OF 2017

¶75

JAYSHREE ARUN GONDAL @ JAYSHREE BHIMAJI DEVKAR AND

¶76

OTHERS

¶77

VERSUS

¶78

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶79

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Tarde Vivek V

¶80

AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶81

¶82

wpgroupVALIDITY

¶83

18 WRIT PETITION NO. 7773 OF 2017

¶84

ANURADHA ASHOK SONAWANE @ ANURADHA RAKHMAJI GARJE VERSUS

¶85

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶86

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Tarde Vivek V

¶87

AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶88

19 WRIT PETITION NO. 7774 OF 2017

¶89

MANISHA PANDURANG SUPEKAR @ MANISHA VISHNU SHINDE ANDOTHERS

¶90

VERSUS

¶91

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶92

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Tarde Vivek V AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶93

20 WRIT PETITION NO. 7829 OF 2017

¶94

SUNIL NANA KARPE

¶95

VERSUS

¶96

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶97

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶98

21 WRIT PETITION NO. 8201 OF 2017

¶99

ASHOK GOKUL KEDARI

¶100

VERSUS

¶101

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶102

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri Autade Vijay R. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶103

¶104

wpgroupVALIDITY

¶105

22 WRIT PETITION NO. 8202 OF 2017

¶106

MANDA SITARAM SARODE VERSUS

¶107

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶108

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri Autade Vijay R. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶109

23 WRIT PETITION NO. 8965 OF 2017

¶110

DADA KHANDU SHINDE

¶111

VERSUS

¶112

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶113

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶114

24 WRIT PETITION NO. 8966 OF 2017

¶115

VAISHALI SUBHASH KADAM AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶116

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶117

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶118

25 WRIT PETITION NO. 8967 OF 2017

¶119

KHANDU BHAUSAHEB BANKAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶120

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶121

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶122

26 WRIT PETITION NO. 8968 OF 2017

¶123

LATABAI RANGNATH CHAVAN

wpgroupVALIDITY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶128

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶129

28 WRIT PETITION NO. 12861 OF 2017

¶130

WITH WP/12862/2017 WITH WP/12863/2017 WITH WP/12998/2017 WITH WP/13024/2017 WITH WP/13025/2017

¶131

SANJAY ANKUSH GOPALGHARE

¶132

VERSUS

¶133

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶134

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶135

29 WRIT PETITION NO. 13653 OF 2017

¶136

PRAVIN CHANDRAKANT DIWATE

¶137

VERSUS

¶138

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶139

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶140

30 WRIT PETITION NO. 13664 OF 2017

¶141

SAVITA SANTOSH UBALE AND OTHERS

¶142

VERSUS

¶143

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶144

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶145

31 WRIT PETITION NO. 13968 OF 2017

¶146

VIJAYA SUNILKUMAR TOPLE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

wpgroupVALIDITY

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶151

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶152

32 WRIT PETITION NO. 13977 OF 2017

¶153

DIPALI PANDURANG GARJE AND OTHERS

¶154

VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶155

Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Vivek V. Tarde h/f Shri More Abhijit S. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶156

33 WRIT PETITION NO. 14285 OF 2017

¶157

SUNANADA SADASHIV DAHATONDE

¶158

VERSUS

¶159

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶160

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Patil Vikramsinh P. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶161

34 WRIT PETITION NO. 14286 OF 2017

¶162

KALPANA SOPAN SHINDE

¶163

VERSUS

¶164

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶165

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Patil Vikramsinh P.

¶166

AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri B.A.Shinde and Shri S.R.Yadav.

¶167

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

¶168

DATE :- 21^st July, 2018

¶169

Per Court:

¶170

9 wpgroupVALIDITY

¶171

1 I have heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties.

¶172

2 In these petitions, the issue is as regards Section 10-1A of the

¶173

Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, whereby, a candidate elected to a post reserved for any backward class, has to submit his caste/tribe validity certificate within 6 months from the date of election.

¶174

3 The learned Full Bench of this Court has held in Anant H. Ulahalkar Vs. Chief Election Commissioner [2017(1) Mh.L.J.431], that the 6 months' period under Section 9A of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is mandatory and any candidate submitting his validity certificate after 6 months, would incur disqualification automatically after the period of 6 months from the date of declaration of his election is over.

¶175

4 The Hon'ble Apex Court is said to be seized of a group of special leave petitions involving the same issue in view of the learned Full Bench judgment in Anant H.Ulahalkar (supra) and has stayed the judgment. Protection has been granted to such disqualified candidates for having failed to submit their validity certificates within 6 months.

¶176

5 In this group of petitions, it is not disputed that the petitioners are declared elected as members of the respective Gram Panchayats. Their applications to the Scrutiny Committee for validation of their caste/ tribe certificates were submitted and the said claims were

¶177

10 wpgroupVALIDITY

¶178

pending at the time of filing the nomination papers. It is also undisputed that in some cases, the claims are still pending and in some cases, the validity certificates have been granted and have now been submitted by the respective Petitioners, though after the period of six months. The respective District Collectors, however, have disqualified the petitioners by the impugned orders. A categoric statement has been made by each of these Petitioners across the Bar that none of them have suffered a rejection of their validity claims. Based on such statements, this order is passed.

¶179

6 The learned Advocates for the respective petitioners have cited two orders passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court on 23.04.2018 in Writ Petition No.5402/2017 and connected matters and on 20.06.2018 in Writ Petition No.6133/2018 by which, it is concluded that, pursuant to the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Authorities can resort to a fresh action against the petitioners. The said petitions are disposed of.

¶180

7 It requires no debate that if the view taken in Anant Ulahalkar case (supra) is sustained by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the disqualification of the petitioners herein by the impugned orders shall stand automatically sustained. If the Hon'ble Apex Court takes a different view and by virtue of the said view, only if the petitioners are protected, then the impugned orders of disqualification would automatically stand set aside and no further action would be required to be initiated against these petitioners.

¶181

11 wpgroupVALIDITY

¶182

8 With the above observations, all these Writ Petitions are

¶183

disposed of. The protection granted by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the bunch of cases before it, would protect the petitioners herein until the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the pending cases and subject to the observations set out in the foregoing paragraphs.

¶184

9 At this stage, the learned Advocates for the Petitioners in the Writ Petitions, in which there is office objection regarding deficit court fees, make a statement that the deficit court fees would be deposited within two weeks.

¶185

10 The statement is accepted. The deficit court fees in the concerned Writ Petitions shall be deposited on or before 02.08.2018, failing which, this order shall stand recalled in those writ petitions and then such Writ Petitions shall stand dismissed in default on 03.08.2018 without reference to the Court.

¶186

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

¶187

kps

Madhav Dhondiba Waghmare v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhav Dhondiba Waghmare v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Executive Engineer, Kukadi Project Land Development and Anr. Vs Govardhan Sukhdeo Korde

Pravin Shankar Koli Vs Virendra Singh and Others

Anil Narayan Pawar Vs Virendra Singh

Jijabai Niranjan Bharti Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sheshikala Ramdas Panchal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sundarbai Vitthal Hanmante Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others