The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad disposed of three connected contempt petitions entered into by the petitioners. The court recorded the signed withdrawal purshis and dismissed the petitions with liberty as granted in a prior order regarding a specific remedy.
Disposed as withdrawn. Liberty as granted in the referred order of 30.9.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2018
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.286 OF 2018 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.288 OF 2018
RAMESH RAMA GUNJAL VERSUS VIRENDRA SINGH
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri Rane Girish S. AGP for Respondent 2 : Shri Tambe S.K.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: July 20, 2018
PER COURT :-
petitioners and identified by the learned Advocates. These three petitioners are present in the Court.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 - CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2018 & ORS
with liberty as granted in the above referred order of this Court.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitions can be disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioners.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to the liberty granted in a previous order of this Court.
RAMESH RAMA GUNJAL
VIRENDRA SINGH
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
