The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition in terms of specified prayer clauses without recording separate reasons for the decision in this document.
The petition allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 1_wp_2548_2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2548 OF 2017
Mars Enterprises and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar with Mr. Sameer Pandit and Ms Sarrah Khambati i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Kedar Dighe, AGP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 13th AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.:-
For the reasons to be recorded separately, the Petition is
allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Digitally signed MeghaShridhar by MeghaShridhar ParabDate: Parab 2018.08.1415:27:45 +0530
Megha
1/1
Mars Enterprises and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
