The writ petition was dismissed in default as the petitioner did not appear and it was concluded that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 319 OF 2015
Mr. Lalmohammed Najarmohammed ….Petitioner versus The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and ors. ….Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Aswani I/b. Mr. J. G. Reddy, advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 5.
Mr. Jay Gala I/b. Diamondwala and Co., advocates for the respondent No.4.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2018.
P. C. :
None appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called
out today. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default.
[SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Digitally signed by Shubhada Shubhada Shankar Shankar Kadam Kadam Date: 2018.08.13 12:22:13 +0530
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Lalmohammed Najarmohammed
The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
