The court dismissed the writ petition as abated due to the death of the petitioner after legal representatives returned the file.
Petition dismissed as abated; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
916 WRIT PETITION NO. 2430 OF 2013
BHAGWAN KASHINATH JOSHI KHADKIKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Shri. A.G. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate, for petitioner.
Mrs. D.S. Jape, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Coram: T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Date: 27 APRIL 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel Shri. A.G. Godhamgaonkar for the petitioner submits that petitioner Bhagwan Kashinath Joshi Khadkikar is dead. He further submits that legal representatives of the petitioner took back the file at the fag end of the year 2017. In view of this statement, the proceeding is dismissed as abated. Rule discharged.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (T.V. NALAWADE, J.)
rsl
BHAGWAN KASHINATH JOSHI KHADKIKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
