This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
901wp2410o13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2410 OF 2013
VINODKUMAR BHAGCHAND MANDLECHA
VERSUS
THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Palodkar Deodatt P.. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Shri S.K.Tambe. Advocate for Respondent 3 : Shri S.D.Hiwrekar.
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 18th July, 2018
Per Court:
1 The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits, on
instructions, that the Petitioner desires to avail of a statutory remedy as may be permissible in law and therefore, desires to withdraw this petition.
2 The learned Advocate for Respondent No.3/ Municipal Council submits that this petition may be disposed of in view of the above request.
3 As such, this Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The Petitioner may take recourse to a statutory remedy as may be permissible in law.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
Vinodkumar Bhagchand Mandlecha
The Collector, Aurangabad
Municipal Council
Others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
