Petitioner's Advocate submitted that subsequent events rendered the writ petition infructuous. The Court disposed of the petition on that ground without detailed discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
918wp10248o17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10248 OF 2017
MURLIDHAR VEDU SONAR
VERSUS
SANMUKHLAL GORDHANDAS SHAH
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Natu Sharad V.. Advocate for the Respondent : Shri Shah J.R..
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 18th July, 2018
Per Court:
instructions, that due to subsequent events, this petition has become infructuous.
infructuous.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
MURLIDHAR VEDU SONAR
SANMUKHLAL GORDHANDAS SHAH
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
