This High Court rejected an 18 WP, noting the petition challenging a 2008 termination order was filed after an inordinate delay of seven years without explanation, leading to dismissal.
Petition rejected; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-WP-2312-15.sxw
BDPSPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2312 OF 2015
Sujit Ramchandra Tabib ..Petitioner Versus Deputy Director, Higher Education Department, Dhobi Talao, Mumbai-1 and others ..Respondents
Mr. Mohan N. Devkule i/by Mr. Kuldeep T. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI &
B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE: 8th JANUARY, 2018
P.C.:-
1] When the matter was listed on 18/12/2017, none appeared for the Petitioner and, as such, the Petition was directed to be placed for dismissal.
2] Today also, none appears for the Petitioner.
3] Even otherwise, we find no merit in the Petition. Petition challenges the order of termination dated 23/07/2008. Petition is filed in the year 2015. There is not a whisper in the Petition as to why
1/2
13-WP-2312-15.sxw
Petition is filed after a period of 7 years.
4] In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition. Petition is rejected.
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition escapable after a delay of 7 years should be entertained?
Whether the order of termination dated 23/07/2008 has any merit?
Sujit Ramchandra Tabib
Deputy Director, Higher Education Department
B. R. GAVAI
B. P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
