Petitioners challenged non-appointment to temporary VRD posts under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan scheme. The court held no vested right arose from temporary appointments and dismissed the writ petition.
Petition dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP5726.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5726 OF 2012
Shri Kunal Parmar and others … Petitioners v/s
The Hon'ble Administrator, Daman, Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Secretariat, Silvassa and others … Respondents
Mr Kiran Bapat i/b Mr Avinash Fatangare for Petitioners. Mr S.S. Deshmukh for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI &
B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2018
P.C. :
that despite the Petitioners being found to be eligible as per the selection process on the basis of the advertisement dated 10th August 2011, they have not been appointed. In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the Respondents, it is stated that the advertisement was for
a temporary period in the scheme Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. It is stated that the advertisement has clearly stipulated that the posts are
1/2
VRD
WP5726.12
created for one year and therefore, the advertisement was issued.
order as to costs.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (B.R. GAVAI, J.)
2/2
VRD
2 issues framed by the court
Whether failure to appoint petitioners to temporary posts creates a vested right in their favor.
Whether dismissing a petition challenging non-appointment to temporary posts has merit.
Shri Kunal Parmar and others
The Hon'ble Administrator, Daman, Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Secretariat, Silvassa
B.R. GAVAI
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
