Hiraman Mukunda Garate v. State of Maharasthra through the Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge court returned the writ petition for filing at the Nagpur Bench because the subject property is located in Gadchiroli.
What did the court decide?
The petition was returned to the petitioner to enable filing at the Bench at Nagpur.
What the court decided
rsk
P-521-WP-2277-18.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2277 OF 2018
Hiraman Mukunda Garate ..Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors. ...Respondents
...Respondents
Ms. Gayatri Singh, Senior counsel a/w Zaman Ali for the Petitioner. Mr. Manish M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2018
P.C.:
- Not on board. Taken on board.
- The subject property is in Gadchiroli. Hence, this petition seeking a writ of mandamas ought to have been filed at the Bench at Nagpur. Accordingly, we direct the Registry to return the Petition to the Petitioner to enable him to present the petition at the Bench at Nagpur.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hiraman Mukunda Garate
- respondent
State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
Coram
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
S.D. Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.
Bansilal Pawar and 3 Others Vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 3 Others and K and M Sheltors Pvt. Ltd. (a
Bansilal Pawar and 3 Others Vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors. and Sandeep Braganza and 3 Ors. - Applicants
Mohamed Afsar Sayed S/O Mohamed Ayub Vs Municipal Corpration of Greater Mumbai