This limited relief writ petition complained that the respondent No.6 had not decided an application dated 28.9.2017. The court directed the respondent to decide the application within two months while keeping contentions open.
Direction to respondent No.6 to decide the application dated 28.9.2017 within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oswpl501
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L)NO.501 OF 2018
S.D.Corporation Pvt.Ltd. ...Petitioner
vs.
Union of India & Ors....Respondents
Mr.Girish Godbole & Mr.Saket Mane & Mr.Vishesh
Kalra & Mr.Submit Chakraborty i/b Vidhi Partners for
the Petitioner
Mr.D.A.Dube & Mr.Upendra Lokegaonkar for the
respondent Nos.1 and 6.
Mr.G.W.Mattos, AGP for State
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.N.DESHMUKH,JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 20, 2018
P.C.:
. Not on board. Taken on board.1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent
Nos.1 and 6 and the learned counsel for the
respondent No.2. A very limited relief is claimed
in this petition. The grievance is that the
application dated 28th September 2017 is not being
decided by the respondent No.6. The learned counsel
for the respondent No.6 states that the Government
of India has decided to challenge the order 8th
December 2017 passed by the National Green Tribunal.
It is not necessary for us to decide the issue
whether the respondent No.6 is prevented by the said
2 oswpl501
order dated 8th December 2017 from deciding the
application dated 28th September 2017.
2Hence, we direct the respondent No.6 to decide
the application dated 28thSeptember 2017 in
accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and
in any event within a period of two months from
today. All contentions of the parties are kept
open. Writ petition is disposed of with the above
direction.
(P.N.DESHMUKH,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent No.6 is prevented from deciding the application dated 28th September 2017 pending a challenge to the NGT order.
S.D.Corporation Pvt Ltd
Union of India
A.S.Oka
P.N.Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court