Disposed

Bhalchandra Haribhau Tingre v. Ganesh Vitthal Tingre , through P.A. Holder Mantra Buildcon and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jan 2018WP/215/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Writ Petition No. 215 of 2018, the petitioner sought to quash a proposed land measurement due to pending litigation. The Court directed the respondent authority to dispose of the pending stay application before proceeding, noting that further steps must abide by the final orders in the pending suit and appeal.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; respondent directed to decide stay application on 10th January 2018.

Bhalchandra Haribhau Tingre Vs Ganesh Vitthal Tingre… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

902-WP=215-18.doc

¶2

SKC

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 215 OF 2018

¶5

Bhalchandra Haribhau Tingre ..Petitioner versus Ganesh Vitthal Tingre through Power of Attorney Holder Mantra Buildcon & Ors. ..Respondents

¶6

Mr. S. S. Kulkarni i/b. Mr. C. Nikte for Petitioner. Mr. B. V. Samant – AGP for State.

¶7

CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI HARISH DANGRE, JJ.

¶8

DATE : 09TH JANUARY, 2018

¶9

P. C. :

¶10

1] By this petition the petitioner is seeking to quash and set aside the measurement which is proposed to be undertaken of a land more particularly described in prayer clause (a) of the petition.

¶11

2] At the same time, the petitioner says that there is a dispute which is subject matter of a pending suit. The 1^st respondent to this petition is a party to the suit. The grievance of the petitioner is that the measurement may be taken by the concerned Authority but in the teeth of a pending appeal before the 2^nd respondent. He is not only seized of the pending appeal but equally a stay application therein.

¶12

3] When this matter was mentioned in the morning session, we indicated to Shri Kulkarni appearing for the petitioner that there are

1 of 2

902-WP=215-18.doc

SKC

several remedies available to the petitioner particularly making the appropriate applications in the pending suit in the event any measurement is taken and any steps in pursuance thereof which are detrimental to the interest of the petitioner in any manner. Our anxiety was to ensure that the Deputy Director of Land Records 2^nd Respondent disposes of at least the stay application.

¶17

4] Since the measurement is likely to take place, let the Deputy Director of Land Records 2^nd Respondent to this petition take up the stay application of the petitioner tomorrow i.e. 10^th January 2018 and pass appropriate orders thereon. He shall not only hear the petitioner but any other affected party as well. All contentions of both sides on the merits of the stay application are kept open.

¶18

5] In the event any measurement is made that shall abide by the final orders in the appeal before the 2^nd respondent so also it would be subject to the pending suit between the parties.

¶19

6] We dispose of this petition with the above directions simply because the learned AGP who was informed to take instructions from the concerned Authorities was not able to speak to the 2^nd respondent personally as he was conducting other hearings and therefore the learned AGP to inform him about this Court's order and directions so that he can take up the proceedings as directed tomorrow.

¶20

7] Writ petition is disposed of.

¶21

(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶22

Chandka

¶23

2 of 2

Bhalchandra Haribhau Tingre v. Ganesh Vitthal Tingre , through P.A. Holder Mantra Buildcon and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhalchandra Haribhau Tingre v. Ganesh Vitthal Tingre , through P.A. Holder Mantra Buildcon and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Villa Collection Co-Operative Housing Society Limited Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Parshuram Govind Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Santosh Balu Vise and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Asha Pravin Agarwal

Icon Line and Anr. Vs Commissioner of Customs and Ors.

Smt. Asha Pravin Agarwal Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.