The High Court noted an undertaking by the respondent AGP for the Collector to dispose of the remaining issue with a speaking order and predecisional hearing within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vikrant 1/2 7-wp-13038-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13038 OF 2017
Shri Santosh Balu Vise & Ors. … Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Milind M. Sathaye for the Petitioners. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat for Respondent No.4. Mr. Vaibhav P. Patankar for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 08, 2018.
P.C. :
vikrant 2/2 7-wp-13038-2017.odt
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Shri Santosh Balu Vise & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharadhikari
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
