Permission to withdraw a criminal writ petition was granted, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted and the same was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP213-18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 213/2018
(AYESHA PARVEEN ABDUL RAHMAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATE : APRIL 12, 2018.
Shri Jambhulkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner has filed civil proceedings for seeking compensation against the concerned persons. It is stated that the petitioner is desirous of prosecuting the said matter and pointing out the fact in respect of non-filing of a complaint by the owner of the house to the Electrical Engineer. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Ayesha Parveen Abdul Rahman
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A Naik
Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
