Petitioner did not appear on three consecutive dates. Court observed the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25 wp 334-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 334 of 2017
Sushanku Builders Ltd. .. Petitioner
v/s.
The Chief Executive Officer & Ors. ..Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Vrushali Maindad i/b/ Abhijeet Desai, for the SRA.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 03 AUGUST, 2018.
P.C. :
also, i.e. on 27th April, 2018 and 6th July, 2018, none appeared on
behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested
in prosecuting the matter.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Digitally signed Prasanna by Prasanna Pradeep Pradeep Salgaonkar Salgaonkar Date: 2018.08.06 11:54:07 +0530
1 of 1
salgaonkar
Sushanku Builders Ltd.
The Chief Executive Officer & Ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDESSai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
