Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable, directing him to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal since the deceased was a Police Constable.
Liberty given to the petitioner to file the matter before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, with time spent in the writ petition to be considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp 2000.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITON NO. 2000 OF 2016
Liyankatbee Shaikh Abdul Jabbar .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Miss. Fatema S. Kazi, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. M. A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Shri. S. B. Bhosale, Advocate for Respondent No. 6.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : 29th August, 2018
PER COURT:
petitioner has remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal as
deceased was working as a Police Constable in the Police Department.
( 2 ) wp 2000.16
sought to canvass the submissions, we are not inclined to consider the same.
the alternate remedy. All contentions are kept open. The tribunal where proceedings would be filed shall consider the time spent in prosecuting the present writ petition. No costs.
[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
ass/wp 2000.16
Liyankatbee Shaikh Abdul Jabbar
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
S. M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
