staff in the Special School and the Associated Hostels attached to the Special schools. Our attention was also invited to the documents placed on record showing the staffing pattern available with the respondent No.4 school, wherein there is a reference of the post of Madatnis, the requisite qualification is 4th Standard Passed, and the salary bracket is 750-12-870-EB-14-940. The learned counsel then submitted that, in the year 2004, the State Government issued a fresh Government Resolution in respect of the staffing pattern. The learned counsel then submitted that, as per the subsequent policy of the State Government, the posts namely the Madatnis, Guard and Safai Kamgar are to be filled ion by contractual method, and the salary for these posts was fixed at the rate of the basic salary plus 50% of the Dearness Allowance. Our attention was invited to the documents placed on record at Page 54 onwards, and at Page 57, there is a reference to the post of Madatnis. the learned counsel then submitted that, the petitioner is aggrieved by the subsequent policy of the State Government. It is the submission of the learned counsel that, as the petitioner is appointed in the year 2000, the State Government ought to have protected the salary bracket of the petitioner to which the petitioner was entitled in the year 2000 and ought not to have changed the petitioner's salary bracket from the bracket of salary of 750-940, on contractual appointment based emoluments. The learned
