Allowed

Balaji Baliram Bande v. Rajiv Maroti Rathod and Others

Bombay HC20 Aug 2018CA/10536/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed four connected civil applications seeking intervention in respect of specific writ petitions. The court permitted the applicant to participate as a party to place necessary facts on record for appropriate adjudication, directing amendments within one week.

What did the court decide?

The civil applications were allowed to intervene in the connected writ petitions with directions to amend the petitions within one week.

Balaji Baliram Bande Vs Rajiv Maroti… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

C.A. No.10536/2018 with connected matters

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10536 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13396 OF 2017

¶6

Balaji s/o Baliram Bande ... APPLICANT

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

Rajiv s/o Maroti Rathod & ors.

¶9

... RESPONDENTS

¶10

Shri S.B. Gastgar, Advocate for applicant Shri S.B. Patil, advocate for petitioner in W.P. Shri L.S. Shaikh, Advocate for respondent No.4 in W.P.

¶11

WITH

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10538 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13411 OF 2017

¶13

Balaji s/o Baliram Bande

¶14

... APPLICANT

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

Gajanan s/o Chandrakant Parthewar & ors.... RESPONDENTS

¶17

Shri S.B. Gastgar, Advocate for applicant Shri S.B. Patil, advocate for petitioner in W.P. Shri L.S. Shaikh, Advocate for respondent No.4 in W.P.

¶18

WITH

¶19

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10539 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13374 OF 2017

¶20

Balaji s/o Baliram Bande ... APPLICANT

¶21

VERSUS

¶22

C.A. No.10536/2018 with connected matters

¶23

¶24

Namdeo s/o Mohanrao Bhange & ors.

¶25

... RESPONDENTS

¶26

Shri S.B. Gastgar, Advocate for applicant Shri S.B. Patil, advocate for petitioner in W.P. Shri L.S. Shaikh, Advocate for respondent No.4 in W.P.

¶27

WITH

¶28

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10540 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13354 OF 2017

¶29

Balaji s/o Baliram Bande ...

¶30

APPLICANT

¶31

VERSUS

¶32

Santosh s/o Mallikarjun Devane & ors. ... RESPONDENTS

¶33

Shri S.B. Gastgar, Advocate for applicant Shri S.B. Patil, advocate for petitioner in W.P. Shri L.S. Shaikh, Advocate for respondent No.4 in W.P.

¶34

CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.

¶35

DATED : 20th AUGUST, 2018.

¶36

ORAL ORDER :

¶37

By way of present Civil Applications, the applicant Balaji Baliram Bande prayed for intervention in the writ petitions.

¶38

It is submitted in the applications that the applicant made complaint to the authorities. An enquiry was also conducted. It

¶39

C.A. No.10536/2018 with connected matters

¶40

¶41

is submitted in the applications that, certain facts are not placed on record. These facts are necessary and relevant facts for the consideration of the writ petitions. As the applicant is aware of all these facts, if an opportunity is granted to the applicant by participating in the petitions as a party to the petitions, he will bring all the relevant facts before this Court for an appropriate adjudication. The counsel appearing for the applicant submits that, the participation of the applicant would not cause any prejudice to the respondents or the petitioners.

¶42

In view of the submissions of the learned counsel, and for the reasons stated in the Civil Applications, the Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Necessary and consequential amendment be carried out in the petition within one week from today. Post the petitions for further consideration on 3rd September 2018.

¶43

(MANISH PITALE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE

¶44

fmp/-

Balaji Baliram Bande v. Rajiv Maroti Rathod and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balaji Baliram Bande v. Rajiv Maroti Rathod and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Khushal Teli Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anilkumar Nivruttirao Boiwar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balaji Baliram Bande Vs Namdev Mohanrao Bhange and Others