Allowed

Jsw Steel Coated Products Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and 3 Ors.

Bombay HC29 Oct 2018WP/1668/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging the non-allowance of export incentive applications. Following earlier decisions, the Court directed the respondents to allow the applications for incremental export incentives within nine weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondents to allow the petitioners' applications dated 30th March, 2015, within nine weeks from today.

Jsw Steel Coated Products Ltd. and Anr. Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1651-18-WP-C-4 & 5=.doc

¶2

Uday S. Jagtap

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2018

¶5

JSW Steel Ltd. & Ors. .. Petitioners v/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents

¶6

WITH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 1668 OF 2018

¶8

JSW Steel Coated Products Ltd. & Ors. .. Petitioners v/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents

¶9

Mr. Vishal Agarwal a/w Mr. Ramnath Prabhu I/b P.K. Shetty for the petitioners

¶10

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Ms. Ashwini Singh for the respondents

¶11

CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.

¶12

DATED : 29^th OCTOBER, 2018.

¶13

P.C.

¶14

These two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenge the action of the respondent no.3 in not allowing the petitioners' applications dated 30^th March, 2015 (one in each of these petitions). The above two applications seek the benefit of incentive for incremental exports done during the year 2013-14 in terms of Notification No.43/(RE-2013)/2009-14, dated 25^th September, 2013.

¶15

1 of 2

¶16

1651-18-WP-C-4 & 5=.doc

¶17

Uday S. Jagtap

¶18

We have today passed an order allowing the petition being RSWM Ltd. Vs. Union of India , (Writ Petition No.9983 of 2017) by following earlier decisions of this Court in JSW Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India, 334 ELT 222 and Welspun Global Brands Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition No.2157 of 2016) rendered on 12^th June, 2017. It is an agreed position between the parties that for the reasons indicated in our order passed in RSWM Ltd. (supra), Welspun Global Brands Ltd. (supra) and JSW Steel Ltd. (supra), the respondent no.3 would allow the petitioners applications dated 30^th March, 2015.

¶19

In the above view, the respondents are directed to allow the applications dated 30^th March, 2015 in its entirety. This in terms of the order of this Court in Welspun Global Brands Ltd. (supra) and RSWM Ltd. (supra) within a period of nine weeks from today.

¶20

Both the Petitions are disposed of in the above terms.

¶21

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

¶22

2 of 2

Jsw Steel Coated Products Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jsw Steel Coated Products Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Commissioner of Centra Excise, Customs and Service Tax Silvassa Commissionerate Vs Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd.

The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise,Navi Mumbai Vs Fertin Pharma Research and Development India Pvt.Ltd

Deputy Chief Manager (Printing and Stationery) Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Mumbai-I

Jsw Steel Limited and Anr. Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

The Commissioner, Central GST and Ce, Daman Commissinoerate Vs Jaisingh Wires Pvt. Ltd.

Euro Pratik Le Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.