The High Court allowed the motion for condonation of 135 days delay in filing an appeal against a CEAT order, being satisfied with the reasons provided in the affidavit.
Notice of Motion allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) for condonation of delay in filing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-NMA-689-18.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 689 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 130 OF 2018
The Commissioner of CGST & Central …Applicant/ Excise Appellant
Versus
Fertin Pharma Research & Development India Pvt.Ltd. …Respondent
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, a/w Ms. Krupali Salgaonkar, i/by Nikhil Wadikar, for the Applicant/Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 25 October 2018
ORDER :
1 / 2
October 25, 2018
8-NMA-689-18.doc
135 days delay in filing the Appeal from the impugned Order dated 5th July 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
prayer clause (a).
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2 October 25, 2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 135 days in filing the appeal under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act can be condoned.
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise
Fertin Pharma Research & Development India Pvt.Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
