Ketan a. Shah v. Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the learned Counsel stated they had not received instructions from the Petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-WP-1655-14.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1655 OF 2014
Ketan A. Shah …Petitioner
Versus
Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Vivek Jalan, i/by Mr. Pradeep Thorat, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Vandana Mahadik, for the Respondents-BMC.
CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA AND
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 11 July 2018
ORDER :
“Dismissal”.
1 / 2
July 11, 2018
17-WP-1655-14.doc
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[ABHAY S. OKA, J.]
2 / 2 July 11, 2018
Ketan A. Shah
Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr.
ABHAY S. OKA
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court