The single-judge bench disposed of the writ petition by accepting the correctness of statements in a reply affidavit. The court held that no further orders were necessary based on the supported documents and thus terminated the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 3210.17-wpl.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORGINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LDG.) NO. 3210 OF 2017
New Pushtikar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and another. … Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. … Respondents.
Mr.Amrut Joshi with Ms.Rati Lodha and Ms.Ursula Misquitta I/b. Lodha Legal for the petitioners in WPL-1413/2017 and WP-108/18 and for respondent Nos.8 and 9 in WPL-3210/17. Ms.P.Haria I/b. Y & A Legal for the petitioner in WPL-3210/2017. Mr.Jayant Bardeskar for the respondent- MMC. Ms.P.H.Kantharia, GP with Ms.Deepali Patankar, Assistant to GP for the respondent- State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : 10th July 2018.
P.C.:
Digitally signed by Sanjay Sanjay Kashinath Kashinath Nanoskar Nanoskar Date:2018.07.17 12:32:02 +0530
None appears for the petitioners. We have perused the reply dated 19th June 2018 filed by Shri Santosh N. Bhilare, Assistant Engineer (Building and Factory), A-Ward of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation. We accept the correctness of the statements made in paragraphs-3 and 4 of the said affidavit. The contents of the said paragraphs are supported by documents at exhibits-1 to 4 annexed to the said affidavit. In view of the aforesaid statements, it is not necessary to pass any further orders in this petition and the petition is accordingly disposed of.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
New Pushtikar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and another
The State of Maharashtra and others
A.S. Oka
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
