The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court accepted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without any substantive discussion of legal issues or facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 10) wp1628-18.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1628 OF 2018
Venkat Sri Maithreya V/s.
Bank of Baroda
..Petitioner.
..Respondent.
Mr.Kiran Thakur i/b. K.Juris for the petitioner.
CORAM: SHANTANU KEMKAR AND NITIN W.SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 18, 2018
P.C.:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the petition. The request is accepted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. ) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Venkat Sri Maithreya
Bank of Baroda
Shantanu Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
