Dismissed

Umidali Jairazbhoy S/O. Late Sultanali Jairazbhoy v. the Collector Mumbai City and Anr.

Bombay HC18 Jun 2018WP/1466/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 seeking directions to update a Survey Register by recording a consent decree and entering the petitioner as owner was disposed of by directing the Competent Authority to examine the request and decide within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Competent Authority to examine the petitioner's request and decide within four weeks, taking filed documents into consideration.

Umidali Jairazbhoy S/O. Late Sultanali Jairazbhoy Vs the… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1 18) wp1466-18.doc

¶2

SAS

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.1466 OF 2018

¶6

Umidali Jairazbhoy s/o. Late Sultanali Jairazbbhoy ..Petitioner. V/s.

¶7

The Collector, Mumbai City & Anr.

¶8

..Respondents.

¶9

Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sanjay V.Kadam, Ms.Apeksha Sharma, Mr.Sanjeel Kadam, Ms.Sayli Rajpurkar i/b. Kadam & Co., Advocates for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr.Milind More, AGP for the respondent-State.

¶11

CORAM: SHANTANU KEMKAR AND NITIN W.SAMBRE, JJ.

¶12

DATE : JUNE 18, 2018

¶13

P.C.:-

¶14

This petition filed under 226 of the Constitution of

¶15

India seeks directions to the Competent Authority of the respondents to update the Survey Register No.317A of City Survey No.4/701 of Malabar Hill and Cumballa Hill Division, situated at Bhulabhai Desai Road, Mumbai by bringing the consent decree dated February 1, 1979 which is registered under No.1061/1979 on the record and entering the petitioner's name as the beneficial owner of the said property in column No.10 of the Survey Register.

¶16

2 18) wp1466-18.doc

¶17

According to the learned senior counsel for the

¶18

petitioner, in similar circumstances, orders have been passed by this Court directing this Court to consider the prayers as aforesaid.

¶19

Having considered the submissions of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP, we dispose of this petition by directing the Competent Authority of the respondents to examine the petitioner's request and take the decision on the petitioner's representation / prayer in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than four weeks after the receipt of copy of this order. The documents filed in this petition be also taken into consideration by the Competent Authority while deciding the matter. The petitioner may also file a fresh representation.k

¶20

With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

¶21

( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. ) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

Umidali Jairazbhoy S/O. Late Sultanali Jairazbhoy v. the Collector Mumbai City and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umidali Jairazbhoy S/O. Late Sultanali Jairazbhoy v. the Collector Mumbai City and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Zoeb Bhai Ahmedali Bootwala and 14 Ors. Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 24 Ors.

Patidar Seeds Pvt.Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust and 15 Ors. Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 41 Ors.

Venkat Sri Maithreya Vs Bank of Baroda

Il and Fs Transportation Networks Ltd. and 3 Ors. Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 5 Ors.

Swapnil Ramesh Raut Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Home (State Excise) Dept and Ors.