The High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 1468 of 2013 after counsel submitted that permanent approval had been granted, rendering the matter moot.
The proceedings were disposed of without any specific order on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918-wp-1468-2013
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 WRIT PETITION NO. 1468 OF 2013
HARSHAD UMARSING PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr.V.D. Sapkale Advocate for Respondent/AGP: Mr.P.G. Borade
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 17th April, 2018.
PER COURT :
. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of
the subsequent development, nothing survives in the matter. He submits that the permanent approval has been granted. The copies of the same are taken on record. The proceeding is disposed of.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) JUDGE
(T.V. NALAWADE)
JUDGE
Sameer/April-18
HARSHAD UMARSING PATIL
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
