In a contempt petition concerning compliance of a writ order, the court accepted the petitioner's submission that the order had been complied with and disposed of the writ petition without further ado.
Writ petition disposed of on statement of compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 381 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3982 OF 1999
Vijaykumar Nilkantrao Salunke.
Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Respondents.
Mr. N.N. Jadhav, Advocate holding for Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.G. Gujarathi, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 16th April, 2018.
PER COURT :-
. Learned Counsel Mr. Jadhav, holding for learned Counsel Mr. Hon – learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions
of the petitioner submitted that the order has been complied with. In view of his statement, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Vijaykumar Nilkantrao Salunke
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
