Disposed

Hanumant Pandharinath Malvade v. Nishigandha Vilas Panse and Others

Bombay HC10 Jul 2018WP/14317/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court disposed of the Writ Petition by directing the Appellate Court to decide the pending Regular Civil Appeal No.20/2017 expeditiously, deciding it by 31.12.2018, while the prior ad-interim order remains in operation.

What did the court decide?

The Appellate Court directed to decide the pending appeal by 31.12.2018; ad-interim order of 12.12.2017 continues.

Hanumant Pandharinath Malvade Vs Nishigandha… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

932wp14317o17

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 14317 OF 2017

¶5

HANUMANT PANDHARINATH MALVADE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

NISHIGANDHA VILAS PANSE AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Amol Joshi h/f Shri Deshmukh R.S.. Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri Jadhavar Shivprasad G..

¶9

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

¶10

DATE :- 10^th July, 2018

¶11

Per Court:

¶12

1 This Court (Coram : V.K.Jadhav, J.) had heard the learned

¶13

Advocate for the Petitioner and had recorded his submissions in the order dated 12.12.2017, which reads as under :-

¶14

" 1. Heard.

¶15

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in RCS No.124/2011 petitioner/original defendant no.1 has preferred RCA No.20/2017. Pending the appeal, petitioner has filed an application exh.5 for staying the effect of judgment and decree passed by the trial court. Learned counsel submits that, trial court has not considered the agreement exh. 82 in its proper perspective and thus erroneously declared that she is having her share in a suit well, bore well, pipe line and electric motor. Learned counsel submits that, deceased father of respondent no.1/original plaintiff had executed said agreement and in terms of the said agreement, such a declaration cannot be made in favour of respondent no.1/original plaintiff. However,

¶16

¶17

932wp14317o17

¶18

the lower appellate court has not considered the same and rejected the application exh.5 in toto.

¶19

3. In view of the above, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 30.1.2018.

¶20

4. Parties to maintain status-quo as on today, till the next date of hearing."

¶21

2 I have considered the submissions of the learned Advocates

¶22

appearing for the respective sides.

¶23

3 The ad-interim protection granted by this Court on 12.12.2017 is in operation even today. Regular Civil Appeal No.20/2017 is pending final adjudication. Rather than considering the entire controversy in this Court, which is practically like hearing the appeal, I find it appropriate to direct the Appellate Court to decide the appeal expeditiously.

¶24

4 Considering the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Adinterim order passed by this Court on 12.12.2017 would continue till RCA No.20/2017 is decided. The Appellate Court shall decide the said appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any case on or before 31.12.2018. The litigating sides shall extend their cooperation to the Appellate Court and refrain from seeking an adjournment on unreasonable or trivial grounds.

¶25

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

¶26

kps

Hanumant Pandharinath Malvade v. Nishigandha Vilas Panse and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanumant Pandharinath Malvade v. Nishigandha Vilas Panse and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Narsimhareddy Koyalwar Vs Vaijanti Rajesh Sikalwar and Others

Parasram Suka Jadhav Vs Prakash Dattaram Gedam and Another

Jahedabee Babulal Patel Vs Naseer Sandu Shaikh and Others

The Acting President Jawahar Educaition Society, Beed and Another Vs Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad and Others

Mangal Sanjay Jagtap Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mohd Ismail Shaikh Badruddin and Others Vs Shaikh Badruddin Shaikh Chand