DISPOSED WITHOUT SUBSTANCE: The petitioner raised no substantive arguments and desired to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn. No legal proposition, interpretation of statute, or substantive decision is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
901wp1069o15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1069 OF 2015
MANGAL SANJAY JAGTAP
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri V.C. Patil Ashtekar. And B R Jagtap AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri S.K.Tambe.
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 10th July, 2018
Per Court:
instructions, that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this petition.
withdrawn.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
MANGAL SANJAY JAGTAP
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
