Petitioners sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 13978 of 2016. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal of the petition.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13978 OF 2016
M/s Shri Rajendra Marble & Granites And Others … Petitioners Versus CIDCO Ltd And Another … Respondents
Ms.Raveena Yadav I/b Ashok Purohit & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.B.B. Sharma a/w Ms. Kavita N. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondents.
….
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ
DATE : 14 SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The petition is allowed to withdrawn. No order as to costs.
[M.S. KARNIK, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]
Digitally signed by Rajesh Rajesh Vasant Vasant Chittewan Chittewan Date:2018.09.19 12:20:51 +0530
Shri Rajendra Marble & Granites And Others
CIDCO Ltd
B.R. GAVAI
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
