Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition as they intended to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for redressal of their grievance. The court granted the withdrawal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 p501) wp13900-17.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13900 OF 2017
Ashok S.Suryawanshi & Anr. ..Petitioners. V/s.
Union of India & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr.Sarwadnya S.Kadtane i/b. Kuldeep U. Nikam for the petitioners.
Mr.Mihir R.Govilkar for respondent No.5.
CORAM: SHANTANU S.KEMKAR AND
NITIN W.SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 7, 2018
P.C.:-
Not on board. Taken on board.
withdraw the petition as the petitioners want to avail the remedy
of approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal for redressal of their grievance. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. ) (SHANTANU S.KEMKAR, J.)
Ashok S.Suryawanshi
Union of India
SHANTANU S.KEMKAR
NITIN W.SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
