The High Court of Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction disposed of a contempt petition regarding non-compliance with a prior writ order after recording the Attorney General's assurance of compliance within three weeks.
The contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.CP.341.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 341 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9794 OF 2014
Ravindrababu Madhukar Ahire … Petitioner
Versus
Shri D. P. Jagtap & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. C. K. Bhangoji I/by R. K. Mendadkar for Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 6, 2018
P.C.
. The learned AGP on instructions from the Committee submits
that the order of which non-compliance has been alleged in this Contempt Petition will be complied with and decision as directed in the order passed in Writ Petition will be taken within three weeks. We record the said statement and dispose of this Petition.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Yadav VG
Ravindrababu Madhukar Ahire
Shri D. P. Jagtap & Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
