The High Court of Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction transferred the writ petition to the original side holding that such petitions must be filed on the original side. No amendment was needed beyond procedural transfer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 13741-17
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 13741 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,|
Appearances, Court's orders or directions | Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders |
Mr. V. S. Tadke i/b Mohan B. Gawade, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Manish M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Pradeep M. Patil, for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 13, 2018.
PC.
Sd/- Sd/[P. N. DESHMUKH, J.] [A. S. OKA, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed on the appellate side can be heard on the appellate side or must be transferred.
VPH
State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos. 2 to 4
A. S. Oka
P. N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
