The Bombay High Court, in a three-toned chamber summons proceeding, made the summons absolute based on affidavit averments, directing an amendment to be completed within two weeks.
Chamber summons made absolute; amendment to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 23.17-chsw--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMON NO. 23 OF 2017 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2301 OF 2000
Mukesh Jayantilal Pabari and others. … Applicants. And Jayantilal Vithaldas Pabari. … Petitioner. V/s. Devendra Jain and others. … Respondents.
Mr.M.J.Pabari, applicant in person. Ms.K.H.Mastakar for the respondent- MMC.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND P.N.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 12th February 2018.
P.C.:
In view of averments made in the affidavit-in-support of the chamber summons, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from the date this order is uploaded on the server.
(P.N.DESHMUKH, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
Mukesh Jayantilal Pabari
Jayantilal Vithaldas Pabari
Devendra Jain
A.S. OKA
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
