No substantive legal proposition laid down. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request for liberty to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13612 OF 2017
Santosh Shankerappa Umarani .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Tukaram Shendge h/for Mr. A.D. Sale for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2018
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
seeks liberty to withdraw this Petition. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) ( B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Santosh Shankerappa Umarani
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
