The High Court of Bombay disposed of two writ petitions filed by doctors seeking liberty to withdraw them with liberty to approach alternative remedies as prayed.
Petitions disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to the alternative remedy available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(906) WPL-3092-18.doc
BDPSPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3092 OF 2018
Dr. Pravain Bhausaheb Shinde ..Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3095 OF 2018
Dr. Sunil Arjun Waghmare ….. Petitioner. V/s The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents.
Mr. Mr. Rui A. Rodrigues alongwith Ms. Aafrin Sameer Shaikh for the Petitioner in both Writ Petitions.
Ms. P.H. Kantharia, Government Pleader alongwith Ms. Deepali Patankar, Hon. Asstt. Govt Pleader for Respondent No.1/State in both the Writ Petitions.
Mr Rahul Nerlekar for Respondent No.2 in both the Writ Petitions.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE: 9th OCTOBER, 2018
P.C.:-
1] Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, on
instructions from the Petitioners who are personally present in Court,
1/2
(906) WPL-3092-18.doc
seeks liberty to withdraw the Petitions with further liberty to take recourse to the alternative remedy available in law.
2/2
Dr. Pravain Bhausaheb Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
B. R. GAVAI
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
