Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner and its advocate on the returnable date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vikrant 1/1 20-WP-13154-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13154 OF 2017
M/s. Mohanlal Silk Mills Private Limited … Petitioner
Vs.
Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. P. S. Cardozo for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 08, 2018.
P.C. :
The petitioner and the Advocate both are absent. The Petition is filed in this Court on 22nd August, 2016. No attempt has been made to seek any relief in terms of the prayers of the Petition. The names of the petitioner and his Advocate are correctly displayed on the board. Today is the returnable date of the Petition. In the absence of both the petitioner and his Advocate, the Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
M/s. Mohanlal Silk Mills Private Limited
Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr.
S. C. Dharadhikari
Smt. Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
