Petitioner challenged interim maintenance awarded to Respondent. Court dismissed challenge, noting Family Court correctly awarded interim based on income split, but clarified final maintenance must be decided on full evidence.
Petition dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-wp-12728--2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12728 OF 2018
Tejas Ravindra Gaikwad ...Petitioner vs. Tejaswini Tejas Gaikwad ...Respondent
Mr. Nitin Deshpande, for the Petitioner None for the Respondent.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2018
P.C.:
. Heard Mr. Nitin Deshpande, learned counsel for the
Petitioner.
1/3
Vishal Parekar
906-wp-12728--2018.doc
that since there are no issues, it is not at all a fit case to award of any interim compensation in favour o the Respondent-wife. He submits that this aspect has not been considered in the impugned order which warrants interference.
2/3
Vishal Parekar
906-wp-12728--2018.doc
stage of determination of final maintenance amount. Such final maintenance amount will have to be determined on the basis of material and evidence which will be placed by the parties in the proceeding and in accordance with law.
3/3
Vishal Parekar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court's interim maintenance award of Rs. 7,000/- per month.
Whether clearances made regarding final maintenance determination should be made at the interim stage.
Tejas Ravindra Gaikwad
Tejaswini Tejas Gaikwad
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
