Allowed

Mr. Prakash Anandrao Jadhav v. Mrs. Manisha Prakash Jadhav

Bombay HC21 Nov 2018WP/8182/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner deposited Rs.3,25,000 as arrears of maintenance to challenge an order staying his marriage proceedings. The court set aside the stay order. The respondent withdrew the deposited amount after ensuring the petitioner conveyed the deposit.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 3rd October 2017 staying proceedings was set aside; rule made absolute.

Mr. Prakash Anandrao Jadhav Vs Mrs. Manisha Prakash… — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

Dinesh Sherla

¶2

906-cwp-8182-18

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 8182 OF 2018

¶5

Prakash A. Jadhav .. Petitioner vs. Manish P. Jadhav .. Respondent

¶6

Ms Sonam Singh i/b Harshad Sathe for the Petitioner. Mr. Kalpesh Patil for the Respondent.

¶7

CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 21 NOVEMBER 2018.

¶8

P.C. :-

¶9

1] Heard Ms Sonam Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kalpesh Patil, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶10

2] On 25^th September 2018, this Court made the following

¶11

order:

¶12

“1. Mr.Sathe, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions agrees to deposit Rs.3,25,000/towards arrears of maintenance amount before the learned 4^th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, within four weeks from today. Statement made by the learned counsel is accepted as an undertaking to this court. The respondent would be at liberty to withdraw the said amount unconditionally if deposited by the petitioner.

¶13

2. The learned 4^th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶14

3. If any, such amount is deposited there shall be stay to the impugned order dated 3rd October, 2017 passed by the learned 4^th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. If the amount is not deposited within the time prescribed,

1/3

Dinesh Sherla

906-cwp-8182-18

this writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. No extension of time would be granted.

¶19

4. The petitioner is directed to convey to the respondent after such deposit of such amount within 48 hours thereof to enable the respondent to withdraw the said amount before the learned 4^th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune.

¶20

5. Place the Writ Petition on 21st November, 2018, for directions.

¶21

6. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.”

¶22

3] Ms Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that in pursuance of the aforesaid order, the petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs.3,25,000/- towards arrears of maintenance before the

¶23

Trial Court within the stipulated period. Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the respondent, confirms that this statement is correct. He states that the respondent has also withdrawn the said amount.

¶24

4] The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 3^rd October 2017 by which the learned Trial Judge had stayed the further proceedings in Marriage Petition No. 755 of 2015 until the petitioner clears the arrears of maintenance which was due and payable by him to the respondent.

2/3

Dinesh Sherla

906-cwp-8182-18

5] Now that the arrears have been cleared, the impugned

¶29

order dated 3^rd October 2017 is set aside.

¶30

6] Rule is accordingly, made absolute in the aforesaid terms. There shall however, be no order as to costs.

¶31

(M. S. SONAK, J.)

¶32

3/3

Mr. Prakash Anandrao Jadhav v. Mrs. Manisha Prakash Jadhav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Prakash Anandrao Jadhav v. Mrs. Manisha Prakash Jadhav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girish Prakash Manakapure Vs Mrs. Amruta Girish Manakapure

Veeena Ashok Parekh and Anr. Vs Chemox Exports Imports Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Suresh Atmaram Kolembkar (Decd) through Lrs. Vs Hariharprasad Mahadev Nachnolkar

Dhanashri Sandip Patil Vs Sandip Sampatrao Patil

Mr. Sandesh Prakash Jadhav Vs Mrs. Jyoti Sandesh Jadhav, (Kum. Jyoti Netaji Tembvekar)

Hasan @ Harun Yusuf Ravi and Ors. Vs Nazir Ahmednmumbaivala Dead Samir Najir Mumbaiwala and Ors.