Allowed

Kishor Sambhaji Thakur v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Oct 2018WP/11984/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a police employee, challenged non-acceptance of his Scheduled Tribe status threatening his services. Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the claim by 31-12-2018 and barred precipitative termination action pending decision.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.2 to decide the tribe claim by 31-12-2018; no precipitative steps against petitioner for non-production of validity certificate.

Kishor Sambhaji Thakur Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wpst-24221-18(905).doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION St.NO. 24221 OF 2018

¶3

Kishor Sambhaji Thakur Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept & Ors

¶4

..Petitioner

¶5

..Respondents

¶6

Ms P. A. Shaw I/b Mr. R. K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner Mrs. Rupali Shinde AGP for the Respondent State

¶7

CORAM :R. M. SAVANT, & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ DATE : 11^th OCTOBER, 2018

¶8

P.C.

¶9

1 The above Writ Petition has been filed principally for the relief that the Respondent No.2 Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar Division, Nandurbar, be directed to decide the tribe claim of the Petitioner expeditiously.

¶10

2 The above Petition has been moved on an urgent basis in view of the notice dated 6-10-2018 of the Deputy Commissioner of Police Head Quarters, Nashik, copy of which is addressed to the Petitioner. By the said notice it has been informed that if within a period of one month of the receipt of the notice the Petitioner fails to produce the validity certificate, then action for termination of the Petitioner's services would be taken unilaterally. The Petitioner was appointed as constable in the year 2001 in a seat meant for

¶11

1 of 2

¶12

mmj

¶13

wpst-24221-18(905).doc

¶14

Scheduled Tribe. The Petitioner it seems had produced his tribe certificate as belonging to Thakur Schedule Tribe at the time of his appointment. The Petitioner was thereafter in the year 2013 promoted as Police Naik and it is the case of the Petitioner that he has thereafter been promoted as Head Constable and is presently posted at Nashik in the Head Quarters.

¶15

3 It is an undisputed position that the tribe claim of the Petitioner is pending before the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar Division, Nandurbar. In view of the fact that the Petitioner's entitlement to continue in service hinges upon whether the Petitioner's claim of belonging to Thakur-Scheduled Tribe is accepted, we deem it appropriate to direct the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar Division, Nandurbar to hear and decide the Petitioner's claim latest by 31-122018. Until then no precipitative steps to be taken against the Petitioner for non production of the validity certificate. The above Writ Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent and is disposed of.

¶16

4 Copy of the notice dated 6-10-2018 is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.

¶17

5 All parties to act upon a copy of the instant order duly authenticated.

¶18

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]

¶19

Digitally Meera signed byMeera Mahesh Mahesh JadhavDate: Jadhav 2018.10.1216:01:02 +0530

¶20

2 of 2

¶21

mmj

Kishor Sambhaji Thakur v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishor Sambhaji Thakur v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjyog Utkarsh Mahila Mandal Vs the Secretary, Social Justice and Special Aid Department

Digambar Jagannath Nimbalkar Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

R.K. Surgical, Thru. Proprietor Mr. Rajesh Parmar Vs the Jt Commissioner (Kokan Division) Food and Drug Administration and Ors.

Janavadi General Kamgar Mazdoor Union Vs He Central Institute of Fisheries Education and Ors.

Ambedkar Centre for Justice and Peace Vs the Collector and 2 Ors.

Deepak Bhatu Gaikwad Vs State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.