Allowed

Deepak Bhatu Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Oct 2018WP/11766/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment addressed writ petitions by municipal employees facing termination and demotion for failing to produce caste certificates during pending Scrutiny Committee validation. The Court held that Section 10 does not empower such actions pending decision, quashed notices/orders, and directed the Committee to decide claims by March 31, 2019.

What did the court decide?

Quashed show-cause notice and demotion orders; directed Scrutiny Committee to decide caste claims by March 31, 2019, and barred termination/demotion pending decision.

Deepak Bhatu Gaikwad Vs State of Maharashtra Thru… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 11765 OF 2018

¶4

Smt. Meena Subhash Aher @ Kum. Meena Ramdas Pawar, Aged Years, Residing at Narayan Bapu Villa, Row House No.34, …PETITIONER Jail Road, Nashik Road, Dist. Nashik.

¶5

V E R S U S

¶6

State of Maharashtra

¶7

through its Secretary, Tribal Development

¶8

Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶9

Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny

¶10

Committee, Nashik

¶11

through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rd Floor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.

¶12

Nashik Municipal Corporation

¶13

through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

WITH

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO. 11766 OF 2018

¶17

Deepak Bhatu Gaikwad

¶18

Aged 47 Years, Residing at Flat No.102, N. S. Hight's, Murari Nagar, D.J.P. Nagar …PETITIONER No.2, Ambad, Nashik.

¶19

V E R S U S

¶20

State of Maharashtra

¶21

Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav

¶22

Digitally signed by Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav Date: 2018.10.12 18:13:14 +0530

¶23

Yadav VG

¶24

through its Secretary, Tribal Development

¶25

Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶26

1/12

¶27

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶28

2.	Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rdFloor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.
3.	Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11767 OF 2018 Shri Rajesh Mahadeo Thakur Aged 45 Years, Residing at Flat No.21, 'B' Wing, Krushna Residency, Dindori Road, Opp. Reliance Petrol Pump, Nashik. …PETITIONER V E R S U S
1.	State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2.	Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rdFloor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.
3.	Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS

¶29

2/12

¶30

Yadav VG

¶31

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶32

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11768 OF 2018

¶33

Jagannath Rambhau Zankar Aged 57 Years, Residing at House No.4610, Hanumanwadi, Makhamalabad …PETITIONER Road, Panchavati Nashik -3.

¶34

V E R S U S

¶35

State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rd Floor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. 3. Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11769 OF 2018 Shri Vijay JagannathThakur Aged 45 Years, Residing at Room No.2, Ravideep Row Houses,Vrudavan Park, Behind Aamrapali Lawn, DJP Nagar -2, …PETITIONER Ambad, Link Road, Kamtewade, Nashik. V E R S U S 1. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶36

3/12

¶37

Yadav VG

¶38

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶39

2.	Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rdFloor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.
3.	Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11771 OF 2018 Jayshri Digamber Thakur Aged 35 Years, Residing at Ganesh Bhuvan, Rambaug Lane No.4, Kalyan (W), District Thane. …PETITIONER V E R S U S
1.	State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2.	Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Vedant Complex, Vartak Nagar Prabhag Samiti Office, 3^rdFloor Vartak Nagar, Thane (West)
3.	Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS

¶40

4/12

¶41

Yadav VG

¶42

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶43

WITH

¶44

WRIT PETITION NO. 11772 OF 2018

¶45

Mrs. Shilpa Jay Wagh Alias Kum. Pushpa Pandurang Thakur Aged 42 years, residing at B-5, Vanraj Rejancy, Shahu Chowk, Opp. Uttam Hire Hotel, Near RTO Peth Road, Panchavati, Nashik.

¶46

…PETITIONER

¶47

V E R S U S

¶48

State of Maharashtra

¶49

through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶50

Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny

¶51

Committee, Nashik

¶52

through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rd Floor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.

¶53

Nashik Municipal Corporation

¶54

through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.

¶55

…RESPONDENTS

¶56

WITH

¶57

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 29422 OF 2018

¶58

Shri Sandesh Madhukar Thakur

¶59

Aged 44 Years, Residing at Flat No.32, Ishwari Bunglow, Near Swami Samarth …PETITIONER Kendra, Indira Nagar, Nashik.

¶60

V E R S U S

¶61

State of Maharashtra

¶62

through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶63

5/12

¶64

Yadav VG

¶65

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶66

2.	Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rdFloor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.
3.	Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS
	WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 29425 OF 2018 Shri Jagdish Shantaram Ahire Aged 47 Years, Residing at Shivam Nivas, Flat No.12, Vanshri Colony, D.J.P. Nagar No.2, Ambad, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …PETITIONER V E R S U S
1.	State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2.	Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik through its Member Secretary, having its office at Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, 3^rdFloor, Gadkari Chowk Old Agra Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik.
3.	Nashik Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having its office at Rajiv Gandhi Road, Sharanpur Road, Nashik, Dist. Nashik. …RESPONDENTS

¶67

6/12

¶68

Yadav VG

¶69

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶70

Shri R. K. Mendadkar a/w Ms. Priyanka Shaw and T. V. Jadhav for Petitioners in all Writ Petitions.

¶71

Mrs. R. M. Shinde, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State in all Writ Petitions.

¶72

Mr. S. V. Marne for Respondent No.3 in all Writ Petitions.

¶73

CORAM	:	R. M. SAVANT AND
		NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE	:	12^thOCTOBER 2018.

¶74

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶75

. Rule, having regard to the nature of the directions to be issued made returnable forthwith and heard.

¶76

The above group of Petitions have been filed by the employees of the Respondent No.3 i.e. Municipal Corporation, Nashik seeking two fold reliefs namely, the quashing and setting aside of the show cause notice dated 5^th October 2018 calling upon the Petitioners to show cause as to why their services should not be terminated as also the orders of the same date i.e. 5^th October 2018 reverting the Petitioners back to the original posts held by them. The other relief sought is a direction to the Respondent No.2 – Scrutiny Committee to forthwith decide the validity of the caste claim of the Petitioners in accordance with law.

¶77

7/12

¶78

Yadav VG

¶79

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶80

It is not necessary to burden this order with unnecessary details. Since the facts in the above Petitions are identical, for the sake of convenience the facts in Writ Petition No.11765 of 2018 would be referred to. Insofar as the Petitioner in the said Petition namely, Smt. Meena Subhash Aher is concerned, she was appointed as a Clerk in the Respondent No.3 – Municipal Corporation, Nashik on 5^th October 1989. She was granted time-bound promotion after completion of 12 years of service as a Clerk. Her Tribe Certificate as belonging to 'Thakur – Scheduled Tribe' has been forwarded to the Respondent No.2 -Committee on 8^th July 2013. It seems that the validation proceedings are at the stage of the vigilance enquiry, insofar as the said Petitioner is concerned.

¶81

Insofar as the other Petitioners are concerned, the posts in which they were appointed and the posts presently held by them as also the dates of appointment and the dates on which the certificates are forwarded to the Respondent No.2 – Committee would vary, however, the basic facts remain the same. The Petitioner Smt. Meena Aher was issued a show cause notice dated 5^th October 2018 calling upon her to show cause within three days as to why her services should not be terminated as she had failed to produce the validity certificate. The show cause notice as can be seen from a reading it is founded on Section 10 of the Caste Certificate

¶82

8/12

¶83

Yadav VG

¶84

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶85

Act, 2001. On the same day, she was served with an order reverting her to the lower post. Insofar as the show cause notice is concerned, she has replied to the said show cause notice.

¶86

It is the case of the Petitioner that no action has been taken pursuant to the show cause notice as well as the order reverting her to the lower post. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3 Mr. Marne was not in a position to context the said case of the Petitioners in absence of instructions.

¶87

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner Mr. R. K. Mendadkar would contend that Section 10 of the Caste Certificate Act, 2001 does not contemplate an action in respect of which the show cause notice has been given to the Petitioner. It was the submission of the learned Counsel that the action for termination if at all can only be taken after the caste/tribe claim of the present Petitioner is invalidated, the learned Counsel for Petitioner would try to draw our attention to the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 7599 of 2017 dated 8^th September 2017 in the matter of Kum. Rajeshri Parmeshwar Gampalwad and Others V/s State of Maharashtra and Others .

¶88

9/12

¶89

Yadav VG

¶90

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶91

Per contra , the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.3 – Municipal Corporation Mr. Marne would submit that the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.11765 of 2018 and the Petitioners in the companion Petitions having failed to produce the validity certificate within the time stipulated, have become susceptible to an action which can be taken under Section 10 of the Caste Certificate Act, 2001.

¶92

We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶93

The instant case exemplifies a case where the proceedings relating to the validation of the caste certificate issued to the Petitioner are pending before the Respondent No.2 – Caste Scrutiny Committee for long. Insofar as the Petitioner Smt. Meena Aher is concerned, the said proceedings are pending since 8^th July 2013 when they were forwarded to the Respondent No.2 – Committee.

¶94

We are informed that likewise is the case of the other Petitioners, the question that arises whether action could have been taken against the Petitioners for not producing the validity certificate under Section 10 of the Caste Certificate Act 2001, the said question has been squarely answered by the Division Bench in the case of Kum. Rajeshri Parmeshwar Gampalwad (cited supra) . The Division Bench has in terms

¶95

10/12

¶96

Yadav VG

¶97

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶98

held that no such power is conferred on the employer to terminate the services of the employee who have failed to produce the caste validity certificate.

¶99

In our view, therefore, the action proposed to be taken against the Petitioners pursuant to the show cause notice dated 5^th October 2018 would be unsustainable. Fortunately, in the instant cases as we have observed herein above, no such action has been taken and the action is still in the realm of a proposal. We are also informed that no action has also been taken pursuant to the order passed by the Respondent No.3 demoting the Petitioner to the next lower post.

¶100

We, therefore, deem it appropriate to quash and set aside the show cause notice dated 5^th October 2018 as also the order of the same date reverting the Petitioner in the instant Petition as also the other Petitions to the lower posts. The aforesaid relief would ennure to the benefit of all the Petitioners except Petitioners in Writ Petition No.11767 of 2018 and Writ Petition No. 11768 of 2018 who have not received such orders of demotion. This relief we are granting solely on the ground the Petitioner's tribe claim is pending before the Respondent No.2 – Committee.

¶101

11/12

¶102

Yadav VG

¶103

Judg.903.wp.11765.18 aw connected matters.odt

¶104

We, therefore, dispose of the above Writ Petitions by issuing the following directions.

¶105

(A) The impugned show cause notice dated 5^th October 2018 and also the impugned orders bearing the same date i.e. 5^th October 2018 would stand quashed and set aside.

¶106

(B) The Respondent No.2 - Committee is directed to decide the caste or tribe claim of the Petitioners latest by 31^st of March 2019 by giving appropriate opportunity to the Petitioners.

¶107

(C) The Petitioners would appear before the Respondent No.2Committee on 26^th October 2018. However, the Respondent No.2Committee to decide their tribe claim within the aforesaid limit of 31^st March, 2019.

¶108

(4) Pending the consideration of caste or tribe claim of the Petitioners by the Respondent No.2 – Committee, the services of the Petitioners should not be terminated as also they should not be demoted to the lower posts only for the reason that they have not produced the validity certificate.

¶109

Rule is accordingly made absolute in the aforesaid terms with parties to bear their own costs.

¶110

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)

¶111

12/12

¶112

Yadav VG

Deepak Bhatu Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Bhatu Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishor Sambhaji Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Janavadi General Kamgar Mazdoor Union Vs He Central Institute of Fisheries Education and Ors.

Ambedkar Centre for Justice and Peace Vs the Collector and 2 Ors.

Shri Murlidhar Sitaram Khairmode and Ors. Vs the Secretary, Planning Dept. and Ors.

Kishor Digambar Gaikwad and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Bapu Devram Aher Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru the Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.