The High Court of Bombay dismissed multiple writ petitions for non-prosecution as the Petitioner did not appear on behalf of the Petitioner during court proceedings.
All writ petitions dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-WP-GROUP.DOC
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signedby JitendraShankarNijasureDate: 2018.09.2913:32:01 +0530
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1111 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1091 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1332 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1900 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1941 OF 2017
M/s. Fab Trade Enterprises …Petitioner V/s.
Commissioner of Sales Tax Maharashtra State, Mumbai I and 2 Ors.
… Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Ms. Jyoti Chawan, AGP for the State.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE: 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.
PC:-
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
1/1
M/s. Fab Trade Enterprises
Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court