Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court at Bombay dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-WPL-1462-2018.DOC
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1462 OF 2018
Schott Kaisha Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner
V/s. Union of India and 3 Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Arjun Nair, I/b. Vinit Dubey for the Petitioner.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE: 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.
PC:-
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signedby JitendraShankarNijasureDate: 2018.09.2913:32:04 +0530
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
1/1
Schott Kaisha Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court