The High Court of Judicialature at Bombay dismissed two testamentary suits (No. 98 of 2017 and No. 158 of 2017) as withdrawn, thereby settling the disputes and directing refund of court fees.
Refund of court fees in accordance with the Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-902-TS98-17.DOC
Arun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 98 OF 2017
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2246 OF 2016
Ana Rosa D’Cruz Alias Ann Rose D’Cruz…Plaintiff
Versus
Renato Francis Rodricks…Defendant
WITH
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 158 OF 2017
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 359 OF 2017
Renato Francis Rodricks …Plaintiff VersusAna Rosa D’Cruz Alias Ann Rose D’Cruz …Defendant Mr Ivor Peter D’Cruz , with Mr Rajesh Machado, Mrs Payal Kundu i/b Mr Ivor Peter D’Cruz, for the Plaintiff in Testamentary Suit No. 98 of 2017 and for the Defendant in Testamentary Suit No. 158 of 2017.MrVijay B Dhingreja , with Mr Rajesh Mishra, for the Defendant in Testamentary Suit No. 98 of 2017 and for the Plaintiff in Testamentary Suit No. 158 of 2017.CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 13th March 2018
Page 1 of 2
13th March 2018
901-902-TS98-17.DOC
PC:-
1. The disputes are settled. The Suits are dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees in accordance with the Rules.
2. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 2 of 2
13th March 2018
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court