The single judge recalled a previous order dismissing a civil application and restored the matter to file because the petitioner's counsel was unavailable on the date of the earlier hearing.
Cancellation of order dated 20th November 2017; Civil Application No. 2642 of 2017 restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-CAW72-18.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2018
IN
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2642 OF 2017
Dhondi Bhairu Patil (since deceased) through LRs …Petitioners Versus Maruti Aba Patil (since deceased) through LRs …Respondents
Mrs Varsha Palav , for the Petitioners. Mr PM Arjunwadkar , for the Respondent/Applicant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 13th March 2018
PC:-
1. The original Petitioners were not represented on 20th November 2017. By my order of that date I noted inter alia that Rule was issued on 10th April 2002 and it was followed by interim relief. The Civil Application itself was filed by some of the Respondents. The Petitioners were not heard since their Advocate who had filed a vakalatnama was unavailable that date. In fact a leave note had been filed by Ms Palav. I inadvertently overlooked this, and therefore Ms Palav was not present on that date.
Page 1 of 2 13th March 2018
9-CAW72-18.DOC
2. On this limited ground, the order of 20th November 2017 is recalled.
3. Civil Application No. 2642 of 2017 is restored to file.
4. It will be listed before the Court to whom these Writ Petitions are assigned.
5. Civil Application No. 72 of 2018 is disposed of in these terms.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 2 of 2 13th March 2018
Dhondi Bhairu Patil (since deceased) through LRs
Maruti Aba Patil (since deceased) through LRs
Ms Varsha Palav
Mr PM Arjunwadkar
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
