In an oral order, the Bombay High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of Tax Appeal No. 34 of 2010. The appellant counsel relied on a CBDT circular regarding low liability, and the court acceded to the request.
Allow the appeal to be withdrawn and dispose of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ta34.10
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO.34 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nashik
..APPELLANT
VERSUS
Shri Arihant Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha, Dhule
..RESPONDENT
Mrs (Dr.) Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar , Advocate for appellant
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE : 5th October, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
Mrs Kalalata Patil - Bharaswadkar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant placed on record communication dated 26th September, 2018. The said communication is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The common ground assigned in this communication is, the liability involved in the matter is below Rs.50 Lakhs and the reference is made to Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11th July, 2018, issued by the C.B.D.T. The Counsel is thus requested to withdraw the appeal.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
Anant Manohar Joshi
Digitally signed by Anant Manohar Joshi Date: 2018.10.06 10:31:21 +0530
amj
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nashik
Shri Arihant Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha, Dhule
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
