Petitioner challenged non-compliance with an order directing the college to release documents. Court noted college's affidavit and undertaking stating documents were delivered and grievance satisfied, resulting in dismissal.
Petitioner's grievance is treated as satisfied and the petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.595/2018
(( 1 ))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.595 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6904 OF 2015
Shubham s/o Vijaysing Patil
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Dr. L.K. Kshirsagar ... RESPONDENT
Shri Paresh B. Patil, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.D. Khade, Advocate for respondent
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATED : 4th OCTOBER, 2018.
ORAL ORDER :
Contempt Petition No.595/2018
(( 2 ))
other documents of the petitioner considering that the validity certificate is received by the petitioner. The grievance was that, in spite of the order passed by this Court, the documents are not handed over to the petitioner.
(MANISH PITALE) JUDGE
(PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE
fmp/-
Faridkhan Mahammadkhan Pathan
Digitally signed by Faridkhan Mahammadkhan Pathan Date: 2018.10.05 10:10:49 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is aggrieved given that the college submitted an undertaking confirming delivery of documents.
Shubham s/o Vijaysing Patil
Dr. L.K. Kshirsagar
Prasantha B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
