This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Revn 88 of 2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 88 OF 2002 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 87 OF 2002
Dr. Sachin Sharadchandra Chingre ….Applicant Vs. Dr. Vijay V. Doiphode and Ors. ….Respondents
None for Applicant
Mrs. Neeta S. Jain – APP for the State
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. MONDAY , 8TH JANUARY, 2018
P.C.
. None appears for the Applicant. Hence, this Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
1/1
V.A. Tikam
Dr. Sachin Sharadchandra Chingre
Dr. Vijay V. Doiphode and Ors.
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
